Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.
Episode 11 with Dr. Thomas Krause argues that safety metrics improve only after leaders change the daily decisions, conversations, and conditions behind them.
Workload calibration is a practical way to distinguish sustainable demand from exposure that quietly weakens attention, judgment, and recovery. This explainer gives supervisors and EHS managers four states to test before workload becomes a safety event.
Use a ten-day field test to find out whether a safety rule controls the real exposure, survives changed conditions, and gives workers a clear decision boundary.
The right to stop unsafe work is often presented as a cultural aspiration, yet its real value depends on the operating system around it. In the Headline Podcast documentary panel, former MSHA inspector Gary Pietro and union leader Mike Caputo connect worker authority to enforcement history, legal protection, and the conditions that make refusal credible. For senior leaders, the practical question is not whether workers are told to speak up. It is whether the organization can receive a stop-work decision, protect the person who made it, investigate the condition, and restart only when evidence supports the change.
A safety culture is tested when output, schedule, and protection compete. Leaders reveal the real culture through four decisions about escalation, authority, resources, and recovery after a pressured job.
Exposure limits only guide safe work when supervisors match the number to its source, averaging period, task, and control response. This glossary separates four references that are often treated as interchangeable.
Use a six-step control-owner interview to test whether a safety control is understood, verified, and bounded before a leader accepts the remaining risk.
The 2005 Texas City refinery disaster shows how production pressure can separate technical warnings from executive decisions. This case study turns the CSB, Baker Panel, and OSHA record into a practical risk-management test for high-consequence operations.
Permit-to-work, task authorization, and control-of-work systems do different jobs. This comparison shows which gate fits the hazard and decision a US operation must manage.
Critical exposure rarely persists because nobody cares. It persists when ownership is implied, divided, or postponed. This article presents four decisions that turn risk ownership into an operating practice rather than a line in a register.