4 questions from Episode 10 with Tim Page-Bottorff
Tim Page-Bottorff reframes incident investigation around four questions that move leaders from blame toward evidence, action, and field recovery.
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Category
Tim Page-Bottorff reframes incident investigation around four questions that move leaders from blame toward evidence, action, and field recovery.
A Quick F7 glossary for incident investigation teams that need cleaner evidence language before findings harden too early.
A field procedure for preserving CCTV, access-control, sensor, and phone evidence after a workplace incident before overwrite or rumor weakens the case.
Run a safety stand-down after a high-potential near miss by pausing exposed work, naming the weak control, setting restart evidence and scanning similar areas.
A comparative guide for incident investigators choosing between an evidence map, timeline, and causal factor chart after a serious event.
Incident timeline drift weakens findings when evidence, interviews, decisions and corrective actions no longer share the same clock.
Build a witness interview plan after a serious incident without turning interviews into blame, rumor, or legal exposure.
Distribute an incident learning brief by mapping who can repeat the risk pattern, translating the lesson for supervisors, and verifying field behavior.
Rodney Rocha turns Columbia into a practical test of escalation discipline, dissent protection, and decision ownership before uncertainty becomes loss.
A role-profile guide for new incident investigation facilitators who need to protect the first facts, interview quality, control analysis and line ownership before the RCA becomes paperwork.