Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.
The hierarchy of controls is not a poster or a ranking exercise. It is a decision method that helps leaders remove exposure, strengthen barriers, and avoid treating worker effort as the main control.
A risk register becomes useful when it changes the weekly work plan. This eight-step method helps supervisors and EHS practitioners connect each material exposure to a named owner, a working control, current evidence, and a decision boundary before work is scheduled.
Corrie Pitzer explains why safety metrics need risk competence, field attention, and control evidence before leaders can trust a quiet record.
Psychological safety is not a mood survey or a soft leadership promise. It is the operating condition that determines whether people report weak signals early, challenge a risky plan, and help leaders correct exposure before harm occurs.
Safety-critical elements are safeguards whose failure could create a major consequence. These four tests help leaders verify that each barrier remains dependable in real work.
A lifting plan is ready only when the load, equipment, people, route, and stop conditions are clear enough to verify before movement begins.
The Farmington No. 9 explosion killed 78 miners in 1968 and helped trigger the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. Its enduring lesson is not only technical control. It is how leaders convert catastrophic evidence into decisions that remain visible after the memorials, hearings, and headlines fade.
Safety decisions fail when the review layer lacks either proximity to the work or authority to change the condition. This comparison explains when task-level, site-level, and executive reviews should own a decision, how evidence should drive escalation, and how leaders verify that governance changed the work.
A safety concern can be reported on time and still remain dangerous when the organization delays ownership, authorizes work without evidence, or closes the conversation before the control is verified. This Headline Podcast analysis frames safety decision latency as a leadership problem in U.S. plants and gives plant managers three tests for finding where critical risk is waiting for a decision.
Alanna Ball's Episode 13 perspective shows why imposter syndrome can be a psychological-safety signal when people lack visibility, belonging, or permission to challenge decisions.