Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.
Episode 7 with Rodney Rocha reframes the burden of proof in safety decisions. When information is incomplete, leaders should preserve the original warning, make assumptions visible, assign an owner, and provide protection before asking workers to prove that a task is unsafe.
EHS teams are expected to protect the organization while absorbing its unresolved risk, urgency, and conflict. This diagnostic shows five strain signals that should change workload, escalation, and leadership design before exhaustion becomes a safety-system failure.
Many safety dashboards count meetings, inspections, and training hours without showing whether critical exposure is becoming more controlled. This article defines a practical safety indicator and presents four tests that help leaders distinguish activity from evidence, connect metrics to decisions, and avoid celebrating a green dashboard that says little about serious risk.
A practical 30-minute method for supervisors to test a job safety analysis against real field conditions, critical controls, ownership, and stop-work decisions.
The Imperial Sugar disaster shows why combustible dust must be governed as a board-level process risk, not treated as a housekeeping issue today.
Workload caps, roster redesign, and recovery protection address different psychosocial exposures. This comparison shows which control fits demand, work pattern, and recovery risk.
Psychological safety is not proven by a survey score. It is proven when expert warnings reach the person who can change the work, and the decision visibly responds.
Episode 12 with Clive Lloyd reframes safety compliance as only one part of the control system. The deeper test is whether workers can raise difficult information, see a fair response, and trust leaders when production pressure changes the plan.
A leading indicator is useful only when it connects a defined exposure to field evidence, a named owner, and a response. This glossary explains four tests that help safety leaders distinguish control quality from activity counting.
A risk-based inspection route helps a small plant spend field time where exposure and control uncertainty are highest. This 21-day guide shows EHS leaders and supervisors how to build a route that produces decisions rather than another calendar of routine walks.