Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.
Episode 9 with Corrie Pitzer reframes risk competence as the ability to verify whether a chosen control still matches the work, rather than treating a signed procedure as proof that exposure is managed.
Voice climate is the operating condition that shapes whether people raise concerns, challenge a plan, and expect a meaningful response. This explainer defines the concept, separates it from psychological safety and trust, and presents six signals that help supervisors and leaders test whether speak-up has a real route into a decision.
A safe procedure only works when it supports real field decisions. This 14-day workflow helps supervisors observe the gap, repair the control, test the revision, and close the feedback loop with the crew.
Episode 14 with Michael Emery shows why safety coaching depends on disciplined questions, listening, and field verification rather than correction alone.
Safety coaching often fails before the conversation begins. If supervisors treat every deviation as a personal choice, they miss unclear plans, weak controls, production pressure, and task conditions that make the same behavior predictable. This diagnostic identifies five traps that keep coaching focused on the wrong problem.
Evidence contamination begins when the incident record changes before investigators have preserved what was observed, measured, or said. This glossary explains four moments where contamination enters, how to distinguish a damaged record from an incomplete one, and what leaders can do to protect findings without turning the review into a blame exercise.
Plant leaders do not create psychological safety by asking people to speak up and then disappearing into a workflow. This 30-day F2 guide shows how to receive bad news, protect the work, decide visibly, and close the loop without turning every concern into a blame exercise.
The 1976 Seveso accident changed major-hazard safety by moving accountability beyond the plant boundary. This incident-investigation case explains how prevention, emergency planning, public information, and inspection became one governance system.
Lockout/tagout, machine guarding, and interlocked access solve different safety problems. This comparison helps maintenance, engineering, EHS, and operations leaders choose the primary control by task state, access requirement, and energy exposure.
Returning after a mental-health absence is not a handover from the clinic to the line manager. It is a work-design decision that must connect functional capacity, job demands, privacy, temporary controls, and follow-up. This critical diagnostic identifies five failures that leave managers guessing and workers exposed.