Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Category
A critical F1 diagnostic for executives, risk owners, and EHS leaders who need to distinguish a populated risk register from a current decision picture.
A practical F2 guide for maintenance managers and EHS leaders who need to test safety escalation before shutdown pressure exposes gaps in authority, communication, evidence, and restart decisions.
Control confidence is the evidence behind a safety decision. A control should not be treated as ready merely because it appears in a procedure, permit, or risk register. Leaders need to distinguish planned, present, tested, and sustained control states before high-risk work begins.
Control release is not a signature at the bottom of a permit. It is a named decision that high-risk work can begin because the critical controls, boundaries, competence, and response route are available in the conditions people will actually face.
A change can be approved, documented, and still leave the operation exposed. This diagnostic explains five management-of-change gaps that allow temporary decisions to become permanent risk, with practical tests for EHS leaders, supervisors, and project owners.
Residual risk is the exposure that remains after safeguards are applied, not a polite label for an incomplete assessment. This explainer gives managers four questions for deciding whether the remaining exposure is understood, owned, time-bound, and verified in the work.
Risk normalization occurs when repeated exposure feels safe because it is familiar. This explainer shows four signals that routine work has lost decision discipline and how leaders can restore visible control.
Boards do not need to approve every control, but they do need to know which residual risks the organization is accepting, reducing, or transferring. This comparison shows how to make that decision visible without turning risk governance into paperwork.
Corrie Pitzer’s Episode 9 argument is practical and uncomfortable: a control can reduce exposure while also reducing attention. Risk competence keeps people ready to recognize changing conditions instead of waiting for a system to warn them.
A safety pre-mortem helps production, maintenance, and EHS teams identify how a planned change could fail before the new condition reaches the first shift.
