Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Category
Safety metric latency is the delay between a meaningful change in risk and the decision that protects the work. This F1 diagnostic shows executives how to distinguish fresh reporting from timely control, expose five decision blind spots, and shorten the path from signal to action.
TRIR is a frequency rate built from recordable cases and hours worked. This explainer separates the calculation from the judgment leaders need to make about serious risk and control quality.
Near-miss rate, control verification, and exposure hours answer different executive questions. This comparison shows when each signal is useful, where it misleads, and how to combine them without hiding serious exposure.
Severity rate is useful when leaders treat it as a reading of injury burden rather than a verdict on safety performance. This explainer separates three interpretations, shows how denominator effects distort comparisons, and gives EHS leaders a practical way to place severity rate beside TRIR, LTIFR, and leading signals.
A green safety dashboard does not prove that critical risk is controlled. The useful test is whether each metric changes a decision about exposure, resources, supervision, or recovery before an event forces the issue.
Corrie Pitzer explains why safety metrics need risk competence, field attention, and control evidence before leaders can trust a quiet record.
A verified PepsiCo South America case, led by Andreza Araujo under a 180-day plan, recorded a 50% reduction in accident ratio in six months. The useful lesson is not the percentage alone. It is how metric governance can move a safety conversation from retrospective reporting to decisions about exposure, supervision, and field verification.
A safety rate and an OSHA recordkeeping classification answer different questions. This glossary explains four definitions leaders should separate before comparing sites.
A safety metric becomes useful when it helps a leader decide whether exposure is controlled. This article presents three tests that separate activity counts from evidence of control assurance.
Safety data lineage is the trace from a field observation or operational event to the metric shown to leaders. This explainer defines four questions that reveal whether a dashboard preserves context, ownership, timing, and decision relevance instead of presenting polished numbers with weak evidence.
