Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Category
A near miss is not useful because it was harmless. It is useful when leaders convert the warning into a specific control decision that changes work before the same exposure returns.
The Columbia case shows how recurring technical warnings can lose authority when organizations confuse familiarity with control. This incident-investigation analysis translates NASA's findings into decision rules for high-hazard operations.
Five Whys and Fishbone both support incident investigation, but they organize evidence differently. Use four decision differences to choose the right starting point.
An F2 guide for investigators and supervisors who need a clean way to separate confirmed evidence, inference, and missing inputs before RCA begins.
Incident memory is not a transcript. Use 5 myths and a 24 to 72 hour workflow to keep investigations tied to evidence, not first impressions.
A field guide for investigators and supervisors who need to lock evidence order before the first interview turns uncertainty into a clean but weak story.
Five evidence gaps can make an incident look solved before it is understood. Use this guide to slow closure, protect facts, and fix the control path.
A Headline Podcast companion on Dr. Thomas Krause's argument that evidence order, trust segmentation, and verification decide whether incidents turn into learning.
The first hour after an event shapes what the organization remembers. This article shows five distortions that erase evidence, blur timelines, and weaken corrective action.
Rodney Rocha's Columbia lesson is simple: investigators should test the system before they judge the messenger, because silence hides risk and delay hides more.
