Bow-Tie vs FMEA vs Critical Control Verification: Which Method Fits High-Risk Work
Compare Bow-Tie, FMEA and Critical Control Verification so risk leaders can choose the right method for high-risk work, field proof and control decisions.
Workplace safety, leadership and risk insights from the Headline Podcast editorial team.
Por Andreza Araujo Host & Editorial Lead
Page 4
Compare Bow-Tie, FMEA and Critical Control Verification so risk leaders can choose the right method for high-risk work, field proof and control decisions.
Shutdown override drift exposes whether leaders can govern temporary safeguard defeats before production pressure turns them into normal work.
Episode 12 with Clive Lloyd explains why zero-harm incentives can weaken trust, hide exposure, and reward clean numbers over control quality.
Field proof gap explains why documented controls, closed actions, and visible supervision can still leave high-risk work unproven.
Use this 20-minute startup routine to test conveyor emergency stop pull cords, reset logic, field evidence, ownership, and stop triggers before production begins.
Rodney Rocha's Columbia story shows why psychological safety depends on shifting proof from the messenger to the decision owner before risk is accepted.
A practical 20-minute field routine for checking extinguisher access, class match, pressure, service status and team readiness before a fire starts.
A point-of-work portable grinder inspection routine for supervisors and technicians who need to catch wheel, guard, power and work-area defects before sparks fly.
A practical twenty-minute pre-shift routine for supervisors who need to catch housekeeping drift before blocked routes, temporary storage, waste, and floor conditions become exposure.
A case-study article for EHS, operations, and maintenance leaders who need to turn overdue work orders into risk decisions, not only backlog counts.